Search for: "S. B. G.3"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 8:52 am
Today, the EPO issued a Press Communiqué concerning opinion G 3/19 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 5:50 am
” Accordingly, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to certify a Rule 23(b)(3) class. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:48 am
— Whatcom County): 3-9-17 Defendant Chief Judge Raymond G Dodge’s Motion to Dismiss 3-24-17 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to CR12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) OCR 3-31-17 Reponse to Defendant Raymond Dodge’s Motion to Dismiss 4-3-17 Response to Defendants Gilliland Ashby and Garcia’s Motion to Dismiss 4-4-17 Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 4-5-17 Defendant… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:12 am
Andrews recently entered judgment on the jury's verdict, pursuant to Rule 58(b)(2), that Claims 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 50, 60, 63, 70, 73 and 80 of L-3’s U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
L. c. 94C, §§ 32(b) and 32A(d), pursuant to G. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:14 am
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/25/2023 "T H E W H I T E H OU S E W A S H I N G T O N S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 2 3 P r e s i d e n t i a l D e t e r m i n a t i o n N o . 2 0 2 3 - 1 4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE SUBJECT: Presidential Determination with Respect to the Efforts of Foreign Governments Regarding Trafficking in Persons Consistent with section 110 of the… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:38 pm
Section 2503(b) [or its successor] on the date next preceding the date of the decedent’s death]. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The requirement of “different decisions” is fulfilled in the present case sincethere is conflicting case law with regard to the way Boards of Appeal haveassessed the EPC Rules which implement Article 53 EPC under Article 164(2)EPC (below I.).3. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:14 pm
Section 2-1106(b)(3)(B) provides that the disclaimed interest passes as if S had predeceased T. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:37 am
P. 26(g)(1)(B), 26(g)(3); see generally Heller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:00 pm
(b) [Substitute Gift.] [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:46 am
Is the term "amendments" as used in decision G 9/91 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (see point 3.2.1) to be understood as encompassing a literal insertion of (a) elements of dependent claims as granted and/or (b) complete dependent claims as granted into an independent claim, so that opposition divisions and boards of appeal are required by Article 101(3) EPC always to examine the clarity of independent claims thus amended during the proceedings? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
3. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The board was enlarged in accordance with Article 21(3)(b) EPC and Article 9 RPBA. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:44 pm
Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi 3. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
s? [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 10:30 pm
Lee required that pro se Applicant Kent G. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 2:27 am
Two annotations discussing the judgment given by the European Court of Justice on 3 May 2007 on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation in Color Drack have been published in German legal journals: Stefan Leible/Christian Reinert (both Bayreuth), EuZW 2007, 372 and Burghard Piltz (Gütersloh), NJW 2007, 1801. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm
(b) [Time of Valuation.] [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:59 am
Determining if a §3014-b “takeover of an education program” occurredIn the Matter of Elizabeth G. [read post]
